User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-1432718-20200505215636: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Najawin wrote: | Najawin wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Incidentally, this statement is incorrect. Parodies are '''specifically disallowed as valid''' on [[Tardis:Valid sources]]. | Incidentally, this statement is incorrect. Parodies are '''specifically disallowed as valid''' on [[Tardis:Valid sources]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200505215636-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:28, 27 April 2023
Najawin wrote: Regardless of the issue of license or intent, I think the idea that the comics were meant to be parody-esque can't be seen as inherently disqualifying, similar to the discussion taking place regarding Curse in the other thread.
Incidentally, this statement is incorrect. Parodies are specifically disallowed as valid on Tardis:Valid sources.
