User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-44988386-20200708230421: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: | DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
Also, @Scrooge, how goes the Twitter query? | Also, @Scrooge, how goes the Twitter query? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200708230421-44988386]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:28, 27 April 2023
DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: to me it seems that these were just known writers using the facilities like any fan, but their work was being promoted to spark interest.
what would really be lost by their removal?
I'm kinda concerned by this way of thinking, not going to lie. Yes, we wouldn't necessarily lose "much", but the wiki isn't supposed to be biased in our coverage. If these comics are licensed and such, then they stay, regardless of quality. If they aren't, they go.
Also, @Scrooge, how goes the Twitter query?
