User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-44988386-20200708231634: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's not the validity question I have issue with. It's just that saying that its, "not a major loss" hurts your argument, because that phrasing is biased. Again, I'm neutral right now. I'm just here to make sure the facts are layed out. | It's not the validity question I have issue with. It's just that saying that its, "not a major loss" hurts your argument, because that phrasing is biased. Again, I'm neutral right now. I'm just here to make sure the facts are layed out. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200708231634-44988386]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:28, 27 April 2023
It's not the validity question I have issue with. It's just that saying that its, "not a major loss" hurts your argument, because that phrasing is biased. Again, I'm neutral right now. I'm just here to make sure the facts are layed out.
