User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45314928-20200709002206: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45314928-20200709002206'''
are we to wait until this discussion too fades out and is picked up years later for the cycle to repeat? it was first raised a decade ago, if the discussion fizzled out - because @CzechOut made logical statements that couldnt be refuted - then it should have been dealt with my admins.
are we to wait until this discussion too fades out and is picked up years later for the cycle to repeat? it was first raised a decade ago, if the discussion fizzled out - because @CzechOut made logical statements that couldnt be refuted - then it should have been dealt with my admins.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200709002206-45314928]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:29, 27 April 2023

are we to wait until this discussion too fades out and is picked up years later for the cycle to repeat? it was first raised a decade ago, if the discussion fizzled out - because @CzechOut made logical statements that couldnt be refuted - then it should have been dealt with my admins.