User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-6032121-20200906104826: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Again though, [[T:VS]] says that “behind the scenes comments are pretty much the only way that a story can be disqualified” for these kinds of reasons. What matters is not whether ''we'' call it parody, but whether its authors and/or publisher thought of it as a spoof and therefore as being outside the DWU. | Again though, [[T:VS]] says that “behind the scenes comments are pretty much the only way that a story can be disqualified” for these kinds of reasons. What matters is not whether ''we'' call it parody, but whether its authors and/or publisher thought of it as a spoof and therefore as being outside the DWU. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200906104826-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:31, 27 April 2023
Again though, T:VS says that “behind the scenes comments are pretty much the only way that a story can be disqualified” for these kinds of reasons. What matters is not whether we call it parody, but whether its authors and/or publisher thought of it as a spoof and therefore as being outside the DWU.
