User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-1506468-20190904083123: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-1506468-20190904083123'''
What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it.
What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it.


I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid.
I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190903191921-1678571/20190904083123-1506468]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:37, 27 April 2023

What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it.

I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid.