User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-1506468-20190904083123: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it. | What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it. | ||
I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid. | I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190903191921-1678571/20190904083123-1506468]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 27 April 2023
What I really think we need here is a change to the policy regarding trailers. For example: if a trailer includes a narrative elements (such as Ace Returns! etc), then we include it.
I think that proposal should settle the discussion and keep users happy. I do feel we do fans an awful injustice by rendering these stories invalid.