User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20170428100652/@comment-4028641-20170428131205: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20170428100652/@comment-4028641-20170428131205'''
Definitely not.
Definitely not.


Line 7: Line 6:


This is the ''Doctor Who'' equivalent to the ''Paul is dead'' theory.
This is the ''Doctor Who'' equivalent to the ''Paul is dead'' theory.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170428100652-1783865/20170428131205-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:40, 27 April 2023

Definitely not.

Rampant speculation which is clearly bordering on parody. We should not, by any means, say that Smile foreshadows the return of Rose Tyler and Meta-Crisis just because of sideways Is on a map.

"Further proof, as if any were needed, may be found in the fact that ‘Noel Edmonds’ may be rearranged to form ‘End old me, son’ – and it is from this that we may conclude that THE THIRTEENTH DOCTOR WILL BE PLAYED BY MICHAEL TROUGHTON."

This is the Doctor Who equivalent to the Paul is dead theory.