User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20191024110110/@comment-1350697-20191024165652: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20191024110110/@comment-1350697-20191024165652'''
I don't immediately see any proof that these are official -- if you can back that up in some way, I don't see any reason why these shouldn't be considered equal in every way to those other channels.
I don't immediately see any proof that these are official -- if you can back that up in some way, I don't see any reason why these shouldn't be considered equal in every way to those other channels.


As for coverage on this wiki, I dunno that there's anything there ''to'' cover? All they seem to do is post clips of pre-existing material.
As for coverage on this wiki, I dunno that there's anything there ''to'' cover? All they seem to do is post clips of pre-existing material.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191024110110-1783865/20191024165652-1350697]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:41, 27 April 2023

I don't immediately see any proof that these are official -- if you can back that up in some way, I don't see any reason why these shouldn't be considered equal in every way to those other channels.

As for coverage on this wiki, I dunno that there's anything there to cover? All they seem to do is post clips of pre-existing material.