User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-26845762-20170418125956: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-26845762-20170418125956'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
SOTO wrote:
SOTO wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Unless the Doctor considers the safety of his vault more important than dealing with Heather. If I haven't made this crystal clear yet, in FftF he only says "we've got to get back to the future" after his psychic paper alerts him.
Unless the Doctor considers the safety of his vault more important than dealing with Heather. If I haven't made this crystal clear yet, in FftF he only says "we've got to get back to the future" after his psychic paper alerts him.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170418125956-26845762]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023

SOTO wrote: Except at that point in the story, having to go back to 2017 makes little sense, unless the Doctor just assumes that Heather has been taken care of?

Unless the Doctor considers the safety of his vault more important than dealing with Heather. If I haven't made this crystal clear yet, in FftF he only says "we've got to get back to the future" after his psychic paper alerts him.