User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416234242: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You did a great job researching there, this is obviously something that's hard to piece together. | You did a great job researching there, this is obviously something that's hard to piece together. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
We should note these discrepancies on the page, and perhaps in some cases on the character pages (bts?) but otherwise I don't think you can all those problems anything but production errors. | We should note these discrepancies on the page, and perhaps in some cases on the character pages (bts?) but otherwise I don't think you can all those problems anything but production errors. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170416234242-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023
You did a great job researching there, this is obviously something that's hard to piece together.
I agree that the writer's word isn't always law, but at the same time it shouldn't be used in an inclusion debate to decide if the story is valid or not. There are many stories by Terrance Dicks that contradict everything that he's ever written, for instance. Mostly his novels.
We should note these discrepancies on the page, and perhaps in some cases on the character pages (bts?) but otherwise I don't think you can all those problems anything but production errors.
