User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170424140853: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170424140853'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Danniesen wrote:
Danniesen wrote:
Line 11: Line 10:


Why would not including it affect anyone's enjoyment of the wiki.
Why would not including it affect anyone's enjoyment of the wiki.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170424140853-5.2.105.85]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:00, 27 April 2023

Danniesen wrote: Yes it would. Really.

Look, Moffatt has said it's "canonical". To even try to debate this is bewildering.

Let it be valid, why does it matter. It's just a children's show, it wouldn't affect you even if it were a valid. Live and let live.

Seriously though, everyone should think why something Doctor Who shouldn't be valid, it's a tv series, it's silly really that we care.

Why would not including it affect anyone's enjoyment of the wiki.