User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-26845762-20200313031335: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Something puzzling to me is that this story's status as invalid has apparently led to notes concerning its connections to other DWU stories to be removed from the page.[https://tardis.fandom.com/index.php?title=Death_Comes_to_Time_%28webcast%29&diff=2722712&oldid=2711774] | Something puzzling to me is that this story's status as invalid has apparently led to notes concerning its connections to other DWU stories to be removed from the page.[https://tardis.fandom.com/index.php?title=Death_Comes_to_Time_%28webcast%29&diff=2722712&oldid=2711774] | ||
"Continuity" is, of course, not necessarily evidence of validity, but it runs counter to the wiki's utility to not have these points of continuity clear and available. Moreso, these things are important when interpretations of continuity were clearly a driving force behind declaring this story invalid. | "Continuity" is, of course, not necessarily evidence of validity, but it runs counter to the wiki's utility to not have these points of continuity clear and available. Moreso, these things are important when interpretations of continuity were clearly a driving force behind declaring this story invalid. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200308132630-25421326/20200313031335-26845762]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023
Something puzzling to me is that this story's status as invalid has apparently led to notes concerning its connections to other DWU stories to be removed from the page.[1]
"Continuity" is, of course, not necessarily evidence of validity, but it runs counter to the wiki's utility to not have these points of continuity clear and available. Moreso, these things are important when interpretations of continuity were clearly a driving force behind declaring this story invalid.
