User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27089953-20200506103006: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My understanding with canon is that it's not continuity, by that I mean a story can count on the sole basis that it's official regardless if some event or statement in it may contradict another story. I'm fine with having DCTT as "valid" or "canon" just like how I'm okay with acknowledging two instances of the same events such as with Shada and Human Nature. The concept of time travel also allows for contradictions of continuity due to ie. the butterly effect. | My understanding with canon is that it's not continuity, by that I mean a story can count on the sole basis that it's official regardless if some event or statement in it may contradict another story. I'm fine with having DCTT as "valid" or "canon" just like how I'm okay with acknowledging two instances of the same events such as with Shada and Human Nature. The concept of time travel also allows for contradictions of continuity due to ie. the butterly effect. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200308132630-25421326/20200506103006-27089953]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023
My understanding with canon is that it's not continuity, by that I mean a story can count on the sole basis that it's official regardless if some event or statement in it may contradict another story. I'm fine with having DCTT as "valid" or "canon" just like how I'm okay with acknowledging two instances of the same events such as with Shada and Human Nature. The concept of time travel also allows for contradictions of continuity due to ie. the butterly effect.
