User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115212711: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You know, that could be a deciding factor, because it seems borderline. All I found (in admittedly only a few minutes' search) was this statement: https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/36e9525b-1e11-4acb-b39d-247189c77142. | You know, that could be a deciding factor, because it seems borderline. All I found (in admittedly only a few minutes' search) was this statement: https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/36e9525b-1e11-4acb-b39d-247189c77142. | ||
It states that BBC Studios is premiering the production, but, since it's on YouTube and isn't necessarily monetized, does that count as being "licensed"? | It states that BBC Studios is premiering the production, but, since it's on YouTube and isn't necessarily monetized, does that count as being "licensed"? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191115212711-38288735]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023
You know, that could be a deciding factor, because it seems borderline. All I found (in admittedly only a few minutes' search) was this statement: https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/36e9525b-1e11-4acb-b39d-247189c77142.
It states that BBC Studios is premiering the production, but, since it's on YouTube and isn't necessarily monetized, does that count as being "licensed"?
