User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-1827503-20191005000732: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-1827503-20191005000732'''
My source, unfortunately, is the last thread. And I'm not sure what from the last thread, if anything, is admissible from the perspective of our policy.
My source, unfortunately, is the last thread. And I'm not sure what from the last thread, if anything, is admissible from the perspective of our policy.


So let's focus specifically on the PDF-format releases for now, not any printed versions. They still pass our rules as I understand them, because only a commercial ''license'' is involved, not a commercial ''release''.
So let's focus specifically on the PDF-format releases for now, not any printed versions. They still pass our rules as I understand them, because only a commercial ''license'' is involved, not a commercial ''release''.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191005000732-1827503]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:29, 27 April 2023

My source, unfortunately, is the last thread. And I'm not sure what from the last thread, if anything, is admissible from the perspective of our policy.

So let's focus specifically on the PDF-format releases for now, not any printed versions. They still pass our rules as I understand them, because only a commercial license is involved, not a commercial release.