User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-24894325-20191014072740: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Apologies for misquoting Scrooge MacDuck. Indeed, "America's most trusted dictionary" was Borisashton. | Apologies for misquoting Scrooge MacDuck. Indeed, "America's most trusted dictionary" was Borisashton. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
I would like the mods to weigh in on this. | I would like the mods to weigh in on this. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191014072740-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 27 April 2023
Apologies for misquoting Scrooge MacDuck. Indeed, "America's most trusted dictionary" was Borisashton.
However, Scrooge MacDuck did agree with this definition by saying.
But User:Borisashton's point that Merriam-Webster's defines it rather differently stands.
The simplest way of correcting somebody's factual mistakes is to point them out. You might even get an apology as the one above.
Waiting for the mistake to be repeated and then engaging in something that to me sounds like a personal attack:
you are now actively manufacturing a dialogue between us that never happened and misrepresenting both of us.
seems a violation of Tardis:No personal attacks.
I would like the mods to weigh in on this.
