User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-27343779-20191011001125: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:If the issue of Arcbeatle Press being a self-publisher is not relevant, why was it mentioned in the OP? | :If the issue of Arcbeatle Press being a self-publisher is not relevant, why was it mentioned in the OP? | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
With due respect, as long as this connection is not unambiguously established following the rules or precedents of the wiki, I sincerely don't see the point of debating whether it's self- or third-party publication. | With due respect, as long as this connection is not unambiguously established following the rules or precedents of the wiki, I sincerely don't see the point of debating whether it's self- or third-party publication. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191011001125-27343779]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 27 April 2023
- If the issue of Arcbeatle Press being a self-publisher is not relevant, why was it mentioned in the OP?
It was mentionned solely because --if i read the OP correctly-- it was raised by some in the deleted thread as being synonymous with fan fiction.
With due respect, as long as this connection is not unambiguously established following the rules or precedents of the wiki, I sincerely don't see the point of debating whether it's self- or third-party publication.
