User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191004215149: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191004215149'''
The individual releases' validity should definitely be discussed. I was just clarifying that the ISBN argument doesn't affect the stories' validity as a whole because that argument is irrelevant to the release of ''The Book Club Collection''. At most, that argument affects whether we consider the release date to be the individual release dates or the anthology release date.
The individual releases' validity should definitely be discussed. I was just clarifying that the ISBN argument doesn't affect the stories' validity as a whole because that argument is irrelevant to the release of ''The Book Club Collection''. At most, that argument affects whether we consider the release date to be the individual release dates or the anthology release date.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191004215149-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:30, 27 April 2023

The individual releases' validity should definitely be discussed. I was just clarifying that the ISBN argument doesn't affect the stories' validity as a whole because that argument is irrelevant to the release of The Book Club Collection. At most, that argument affects whether we consider the release date to be the individual release dates or the anthology release date.