User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191014211938: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'll just repost my response on October 5 verbatim since the argument has come up again despite already being dealt with in my opinion. | I'll just repost my response on October 5 verbatim since the argument has come up again despite already being dealt with in my opinion. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
T:VALID as I understand it does not ask for a story to be published commercially. A story must be commercially ''licensed'' and ''officially'' released but not commercially released. A commercial licence is definitely involved from the evidence that has been presented and it has already been established that the official release date is that set by the publisher. There are probably hundreds of stories that have been released for free currently valid on this wiki, being free does not preclude its inclusion here. | T:VALID as I understand it does not ask for a story to be published commercially. A story must be commercially ''licensed'' and ''officially'' released but not commercially released. A commercial licence is definitely involved from the evidence that has been presented and it has already been established that the official release date is that set by the publisher. There are probably hundreds of stories that have been released for free currently valid on this wiki, being free does not preclude its inclusion here. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191014211938-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 27 April 2023
I'll just repost my response on October 5 verbatim since the argument has come up again despite already being dealt with in my opinion.
Borisashton wrote: T:VALID as I understand it does not ask for a story to be published commercially. A story must be commercially licensed and officially released but not commercially released. A commercial licence is definitely involved from the evidence that has been presented and it has already been established that the official release date is that set by the publisher. There are probably hundreds of stories that have been released for free currently valid on this wiki, being free does not preclude its inclusion here.
