User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20200406230350/@comment-29318293-20200407120118: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've always considered the events of The Curse of Fatal Death as taking place in a parallel universe to N-Space, one where The Time War may not have happened, or The Master had not used up all of his regenerations to begin with. I agree that The Curse of Fatal Death should be considered valid, like any other valid story that disagrees with the """main timeline""" (such as the prose Doctor Who and the Time War, to give a recent example). | I've always considered the events of The Curse of Fatal Death as taking place in a parallel universe to N-Space, one where The Time War may not have happened, or The Master had not used up all of his regenerations to begin with. I agree that The Curse of Fatal Death should be considered valid, like any other valid story that disagrees with the """main timeline""" (such as the prose Doctor Who and the Time War, to give a recent example). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200406230350-31010985/20200407120118-29318293]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 14:34, 27 April 2023
I've always considered the events of The Curse of Fatal Death as taking place in a parallel universe to N-Space, one where The Time War may not have happened, or The Master had not used up all of his regenerations to begin with. I agree that The Curse of Fatal Death should be considered valid, like any other valid story that disagrees with the """main timeline""" (such as the prose Doctor Who and the Time War, to give a recent example).