User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130515221906: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost ''everything'' contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway. | Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost ''everything'' contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway. | ||
I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the [[contrafibularity flu]]. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page. | I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the [[contrafibularity flu]]. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130515221906-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023
Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost everything contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway.
I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the contrafibularity flu. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page.
