User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-28349479-20170125012518: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree that this is a strange decision. We can look past the contradictions and redundancies in the multiple versions of ''Human Nature'', ''Shada'', ''Damaged Goods'', and all the other Big Finish novel adaptations, but not these stories? | I agree that this is a strange decision. We can look past the contradictions and redundancies in the multiple versions of ''Human Nature'', ''Shada'', ''Damaged Goods'', and all the other Big Finish novel adaptations, but not these stories? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20170125012518-28349479]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023
I agree that this is a strange decision. We can look past the contradictions and redundancies in the multiple versions of Human Nature, Shada, Damaged Goods, and all the other Big Finish novel adaptations, but not these stories?
