User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4000564-20200326121602/@comment-6032121-20200327123550: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4000564-20200326121602/@comment-6032121-20200327123550'''
I completely agree with this proposal. ''Battles in Time'' isn't at all "reference material" of the sort that made the Wiki decide to exclude reference material - firstly because it provides new information about the DWU, as opposed to summarizing TV episodes, and secondly because that information is fully narrative.
I completely agree with this proposal. ''Battles in Time'' isn't at all "reference material" of the sort that made the Wiki decide to exclude reference material - firstly because it provides new information about the DWU, as opposed to summarizing TV episodes, and secondly because that information is fully narrative.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200326121602-4000564/20200327123550-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:36, 27 April 2023

I completely agree with this proposal. Battles in Time isn't at all "reference material" of the sort that made the Wiki decide to exclude reference material - firstly because it provides new information about the DWU, as opposed to summarizing TV episodes, and secondly because that information is fully narrative.