User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120025246: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120025246'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Pluto2 wrote:
Pluto2 wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Chronology is enough of a mess already. Allowing WIT would be more trouble than it's worth.
Chronology is enough of a mess already. Allowing WIT would be more trouble than it's worth.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120025246-1827503]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023

Pluto2 wrote: I was talking about the DYD thread. And Worlds in Time isn't really a big deal. It's the same story, but some people might get the pieces in a different order. It's still the same planets visited for everyone. What difference does it make since it's the same narrative, but parts are in a different order?

Chronology is enough of a mess already. Allowing WIT would be more trouble than it's worth.