User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120084931: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, let's get to the point of the matter, then! | So, let's get to the point of the matter, then! | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two. | I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120084931-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
So, let's get to the point of the matter, then!
In the Legacy thread, the eventual decision hinged on the impossibility of separating the narrative from the gameplay. If the narrative of Legacy were to be examined without its gameplay, it was determined there would be too many missing pieces to the plot for it to be considered a story.
I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of Legacy as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the Legacy thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two.
