User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120080258: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Shambala108 wrote: | Shambala108 wrote: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
If it makes any difference, we consider it valid at [[w:c:doctorwho.answers|DWA]], as there are things which are definitely true about the story on every playing which can be cited. | If it makes any difference, we consider it valid at [[w:c:doctorwho.answers|DWA]], as there are things which are definitely true about the story on every playing which can be cited. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120080258-4189499]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023
Shambala108 wrote: ... User:Imamadmad, who is not an admin, posted agreement with the thread. No other users expressed interest in the matter...
No I did not. In fact, I argued rather strongly that Doctor Who: Legacy (a game) should be included as the story line doesn't change in any way, shape, or form, based on what the user does. See also Thread:186659. And by the way, I still stand by the opinion that Legacy should be a valid source for the reasons I have written about many times before, especially at Thread:186659#23.
If it makes any difference, we consider it valid at DWA, as there are things which are definitely true about the story on every playing which can be cited.
