User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170305054156: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170305054156'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
OttselSpy25 wrote:
OttselSpy25 wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
As my page hadn't refreshed, I responded to the old comment. If none of that is relevant, ignore it. But I stand by the fact I made no personal attack. Many people were offended when the Faction Paradox was abruptly shut down. Does it make them right? haha. That's another debate altogether.
As my page hadn't refreshed, I responded to the old comment. If none of that is relevant, ignore it. But I stand by the fact I made no personal attack. Many people were offended when the Faction Paradox was abruptly shut down. Does it make them right? haha. That's another debate altogether.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170305054156-1789834]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:44, 27 April 2023

OttselSpy25 wrote: I mis-read a few points on your post, and I want to clarify that it wasn't as bad as I thought it was. Thus I've edited my post.

As my page hadn't refreshed, I responded to the old comment. If none of that is relevant, ignore it. But I stand by the fact I made no personal attack. Many people were offended when the Faction Paradox was abruptly shut down. Does it make them right? haha. That's another debate altogether.