User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170305055031: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'll be honest, you're not seeing what I'm saying. There's no point anybody here continuing to talk or raise points because you won't accept them. | I'll be honest, you're not seeing what I'm saying. There's no point anybody here continuing to talk or raise points because you won't accept them. | ||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
Please see my point. | Please see my point. | ||
/ On the verge of tears here / | / On the verge of tears here / | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170305055031-1789834]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 14:44, 27 April 2023
I'll be honest, you're not seeing what I'm saying. There's no point anybody here continuing to talk or raise points because you won't accept them.
A DWU =/= The DWU
These are indeed Daleks. We agree on something. But are they the Daleks? Or are they alternate Daleks? It's not difficult. You're not proving anything here. You're saying a DWU means the DWU. That makes no sense.
DWU is a multiverse, I get that. It doesn't mean there's any form of connection anywhere with a LEGO DWU. That's why some of us are sceptical. I'm getting frustrated here because I seriously don't understand how you don't see my point of view. For a LEGO DWU to be valid/legit/whatever, there needs to be a fine connection. Saying "they're Daleks" isn't the connection. I'm pretty sure there are parallel Daleks outside of the Whoniverse just waiting to be explored. Had the Doctor never visited Pete's World, those Cybermen would be invalid.
Please see my point. / On the verge of tears here /