User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170428000303: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree that the fact the Daleks are of "LEGO design" is not a reason for invalidation. That's kind of like saying "Peter Davison's voice is deeper on audio, thus his audios don't count". But, I stand by my earlier opinion that we should truly identify the origin of these Daleks, (i.e. - from which "Whoniverse" they hail), before we come to a conclusion about their validity and therefore the validity of this movie. I won't lie to you, I've forgotten which way this conversation went because it was long ago and went on for a while. But I'm assuming I stuck by that opinion. I think I remember stepping away from this as the debate was circling haha. | I agree that the fact the Daleks are of "LEGO design" is not a reason for invalidation. That's kind of like saying "Peter Davison's voice is deeper on audio, thus his audios don't count". But, I stand by my earlier opinion that we should truly identify the origin of these Daleks, (i.e. - from which "Whoniverse" they hail), before we come to a conclusion about their validity and therefore the validity of this movie. I won't lie to you, I've forgotten which way this conversation went because it was long ago and went on for a while. But I'm assuming I stuck by that opinion. I think I remember stepping away from this as the debate was circling haha. | ||
Has any more evidence come to light? :) | Has any more evidence come to light? :) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170428000303-1789834]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:44, 27 April 2023
I agree that the fact the Daleks are of "LEGO design" is not a reason for invalidation. That's kind of like saying "Peter Davison's voice is deeper on audio, thus his audios don't count". But, I stand by my earlier opinion that we should truly identify the origin of these Daleks, (i.e. - from which "Whoniverse" they hail), before we come to a conclusion about their validity and therefore the validity of this movie. I won't lie to you, I've forgotten which way this conversation went because it was long ago and went on for a while. But I'm assuming I stuck by that opinion. I think I remember stepping away from this as the debate was circling haha.
Has any more evidence come to light? :)
