User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170428011044: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well I'd like to thank you for being kind enough to not get angry at my thoroughness. This Wiki is lucky to have people like you and Amorkuz who accept that some people simply want to ensure that everything is slotted into place before a decision is made. Furthermore, I completely understand that at some point we'll all just exhale loudly and moan a bit and we'll actually agree on something. | Well I'd like to thank you for being kind enough to not get angry at my thoroughness. This Wiki is lucky to have people like you and Amorkuz who accept that some people simply want to ensure that everything is slotted into place before a decision is made. Furthermore, I completely understand that at some point we'll all just exhale loudly and moan a bit and we'll actually agree on something. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I'd like maybe an established admin's view on this so that I know where we stand. I want to know what that admin is looking for out of us. Here's the two of us blindly squabbling and perhaps we've missed something. If it can be rounded down to "we're looking for X", then I know what I'm looking for and, when I get maybe an hour to myself, I can trawl the net. | I'd like maybe an established admin's view on this so that I know where we stand. I want to know what that admin is looking for out of us. Here's the two of us blindly squabbling and perhaps we've missed something. If it can be rounded down to "we're looking for X", then I know what I'm looking for and, when I get maybe an hour to myself, I can trawl the net. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170428011044-1789834]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023
Well I'd like to thank you for being kind enough to not get angry at my thoroughness. This Wiki is lucky to have people like you and Amorkuz who accept that some people simply want to ensure that everything is slotted into place before a decision is made. Furthermore, I completely understand that at some point we'll all just exhale loudly and moan a bit and we'll actually agree on something.
But as far as threads go, this one's still quite young. I agree that the sooner the thread has been exhausted and concluded, the better. But in this case, I think it's just logical to keep it open for a bit longer. I mean, since the debate grew cold, have any of us actually looked for any further evidence? I bet the searching part ended a while back, but that's just me hypothesising. Maybe it's wrong of me to do so.
I'd like maybe an established admin's view on this so that I know where we stand. I want to know what that admin is looking for out of us. Here's the two of us blindly squabbling and perhaps we've missed something. If it can be rounded down to "we're looking for X", then I know what I'm looking for and, when I get maybe an hour to myself, I can trawl the net.
