User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-2.31.133.219-20170428080708: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The point about wether something invalid till proven otherwise got my attention as for rule four it states that "Extraordinary non-narrative evidence — such as the story's author directly saying that the story doesn't happen in the normal DWU – must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4. " which segests tat if we are satisfied that it passes rules 1 to 3 then it is valid till proven otherwise | The point about wether something invalid till proven otherwise got my attention as for rule four it states that "Extraordinary non-narrative evidence — such as the story's author directly saying that the story doesn't happen in the normal DWU – must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4. " which segests tat if we are satisfied that it passes rules 1 to 3 then it is valid till proven otherwise | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170428080708-2.31.133.219]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023
The point about wether something invalid till proven otherwise got my attention as for rule four it states that "Extraordinary non-narrative evidence — such as the story's author directly saying that the story doesn't happen in the normal DWU – must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4. " which segests tat if we are satisfied that it passes rules 1 to 3 then it is valid till proven otherwise
