User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-4028641-20171210073634: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Bwburke94 wrote: | Bwburke94 wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
As discussed above, the comic was indeed changed in the reprints to fit with the new narrative. If we can accept that there are different versions of stories like ''Shada'', some of which are not valid, then I see no issue with only covering this one version of these stories. | As discussed above, the comic was indeed changed in the reprints to fit with the new narrative. If we can accept that there are different versions of stories like ''Shada'', some of which are not valid, then I see no issue with only covering this one version of these stories. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20171210073634-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 27 April 2023
Bwburke94 wrote: We certainly allow reprints of legitimate DWU comics, but in those cases, the comic itself was changed.
As discussed above, the comic was indeed changed in the reprints to fit with the new narrative. If we can accept that there are different versions of stories like Shada, some of which are not valid, then I see no issue with only covering this one version of these stories.
