User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20171124185300/@comment-86.152.200.4-20180101193617: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Amorkuz wrote: | Amorkuz wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Wait so where do the novelisation and The Five Doctors fit into this? | Wait so where do the novelisation and The Five Doctors fit into this? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171124185300-4028641/20180101193617-86.152.200.4]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 27 April 2023
Amorkuz wrote: Yes, this looks good to me. Presumably, the common part using "the Doctor" ends in (TV: Shada, WC: Shada, AUDIO: Shada). It's a bit longish but would be bearable if used sparingly.
Another thought/question. Suppose, as in your example above, a character does more in one version than in the other (perhaps, does something more substantial worthy of note). If this extra action does not contradict other versions, just is not present there, should it cause a fork in the description or should the cumulative version be given.
My current vote is to give the cumulative version in the main part of the page and then have a behind-the-scenes list of differences (at least eventually). I think that is the easiest way of finding necessary info.
Wait so where do the novelisation and The Five Doctors fit into this?
