User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707133021: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Rule of thumb for charity publications is this - does the author still retain all the rights to these stories? | Rule of thumb for charity publications is this - does the author still retain all the rights to these stories? | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Until the policies are reworked to allow licenced charity stories as a valid source, I'm afraid many stories cannot be considered valid, or even be covered on this wiki, period. | Until the policies are reworked to allow licenced charity stories as a valid source, I'm afraid many stories cannot be considered valid, or even be covered on this wiki, period. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200707131140-45314928/20200707133021-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023
Rule of thumb for charity publications is this - does the author still retain all the rights to these stories?
It's what separates books like Seasons of War and Mother, Maiden, Crone.
Until the policies are reworked to allow licenced charity stories as a valid source, I'm afraid many stories cannot be considered valid, or even be covered on this wiki, period.
