User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707135300: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: | DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Which means the ''story'' is unlicensed, but the use of the ''character'' isn't, ergo, the wiki doesn't cover unlicensed stories. | Which means the ''story'' is unlicensed, but the use of the ''character'' isn't, ergo, the wiki doesn't cover unlicensed stories. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200707131140-45314928/20200707135300-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023
DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: where does it say that the writers need rights to the stories? some writers have given permission for their characters to be used in say Faction Paradox. these writers have no rights to the project, but it is still an officially licensed appearance of their character.
Which means the story is unlicensed, but the use of the character isn't, ergo, the wiki doesn't cover unlicensed stories.
