User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45314928-20200723190130: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Umberella term because of the multiple tweet-alongs hosted by her under the brand (as well as the classic rewatches that she promoted)... nothing to do with fan films, unless I’m missing something big...! | Umberella term because of the multiple tweet-alongs hosted by her under the brand (as well as the classic rewatches that she promoted)... nothing to do with fan films, unless I’m missing something big...! | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Can we PLEASE move this onto the correct discussion? | Can we PLEASE move this onto the correct discussion? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200723190130-45314928]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
Umberella term because of the multiple tweet-alongs hosted by her under the brand (as well as the classic rewatches that she promoted)... nothing to do with fan films, unless I’m missing something big...!
Doctor Who fan fiction has nothing to do with the DW brand, so yes you have a misguided definition. Only official sources should be referenced on this site, while some extremely important fan works can get pages of their own this is not the norm.
Can we PLEASE move this onto the correct discussion?
