User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45692830-20200511003755: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My concern about the "meta wiki" issue is that the page would be initially sparsely populated, saying something like, "oh, this thing exists", and then other stories might reference specific articles in it (again, as unlikely as that is), which would then have people saying "and it has articles xyz that say abc" etc etc., primarily to fill out the page. | My concern about the "meta wiki" issue is that the page would be initially sparsely populated, saying something like, "oh, this thing exists", and then other stories might reference specific articles in it (again, as unlikely as that is), which would then have people saying "and it has articles xyz that say abc" etc etc., primarily to fill out the page. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
As for the credits, I only brought them up because the titles were brought up, so I was pointing out that the credits also had an issue and were slightly more problematic. I don't actually think either are a problem in any way. Someone else might, but while some elements of this make me a little uneasy, the credits and title sequence do not. | As for the credits, I only brought them up because the titles were brought up, so I was pointing out that the credits also had an issue and were slightly more problematic. I don't actually think either are a problem in any way. Someone else might, but while some elements of this make me a little uneasy, the credits and title sequence do not. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200511003755-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
My concern about the "meta wiki" issue is that the page would be initially sparsely populated, saying something like, "oh, this thing exists", and then other stories might reference specific articles in it (again, as unlikely as that is), which would then have people saying "and it has articles xyz that say abc" etc etc., primarily to fill out the page.
I don't think it's a major issue. But I do think it's worth considering.
The T:NO RW point is well taken as for the "is this even the same website" question. Which applies equally well to Big Finish and DWM. And I'm still inclined to think this thing is valid. But this is enough to make me look at it a little sketchily.
As for the credits, I only brought them up because the titles were brought up, so I was pointing out that the credits also had an issue and were slightly more problematic. I don't actually think either are a problem in any way. Someone else might, but while some elements of this make me a little uneasy, the credits and title sequence do not.
