User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-25117610-20170222205454: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
I am neither pro or against deeming DiT valid, but it is a fact we use stories to recton previous ones | I am neither pro or against deeming DiT valid, but it is a fact we use stories to recton previous ones | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170222205454-25117610]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote: We can't use stories to retcon other stories. It would just be a silly way of running the site. What if a book said that any other story was a dream? We'd just ignore it.
Actually, we do use stories to recton other (to some extension, at least).
By the time The Unbound Universe came out, we deemed Sympathy for the Devil invalid. Considering the events of the anthology, we decided do deem it valid. I'm sure there are another examples, but this is the one that comes to mind right now.
I am neither pro or against deeming DiT valid, but it is a fact we use stories to recton previous ones
