User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170224201344: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170224201344'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
82.3.146.201 wrote:
82.3.146.201 wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


The next logical step is to contact an admin, probably even CzechOut, even if it means the threat of a premature end.
The next logical step is to contact an admin, probably even CzechOut, even if it means the threat of a premature end.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170224201344-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 April 2023

82.3.146.201 wrote: OttselSpy25, do you have any more questions on the subject? And do you think the above evidence is enough to convince the opposing side?

I think it's a very strong case. My worries are that an admin might swiftly disagree before closing the thread.

The next logical step is to contact an admin, probably even CzechOut, even if it means the threat of a premature end.