User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123902: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
Additionally if this thread was to be closed now, it would be in '''no-one's''' best interest as this debate hasn't properly played out. An admin closing it now would go against everything these threads are for. | Additionally if this thread was to be closed now, it would be in '''no-one's''' best interest as this debate hasn't properly played out. An admin closing it now would go against everything these threads are for. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170223123902-5.2.105.85]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote: Eh these days I tend to sway between sides.
I would love to call DiT valid, I think the copyright argument is just poorly set-up, and I'm sure we could find quotes to change the tides. But at the same time, I wouldn't know how to explain the story. It's super badly written.
It's just hard for me to get super invested in a thread that I don't expect to be left open for very long.
Additionally if this thread was to be closed now, it would be in no-one's best interest as this debate hasn't properly played out. An admin closing it now would go against everything these threads are for.
