User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150822182042: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150822182042'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Notsimonpegg wrote:
Notsimonpegg wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Okay, so before we going about deciding if the entire ''series'' as a concept is valid, can we at least agree, on an individual basis, that some of them are blatant spoofs? That way we can get one thing out of the way at a time.
Okay, so before we going about deciding if the entire ''series'' as a concept is valid, can we at least agree, on an individual basis, that some of them are blatant spoofs? That way we can get one thing out of the way at a time.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150822182042-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:27, 27 April 2023

Notsimonpegg wrote: WeLoveTITANS is obviously not meant to count; it's an advertisement. It would be like saying the PRIME computer adverts are valid sources, or that the Doctor has a TARDIS tuner.

Okay, so before we going about deciding if the entire series as a concept is valid, can we at least agree, on an individual basis, that some of them are blatant spoofs? That way we can get one thing out of the way at a time.