User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150824105758: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150824105758'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Notsimonpegg wrote:
Notsimonpegg wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
According to what I can tell, actually, we have precedent for including stories released as advertisements. Look at ''[[Doctor Who and the Daleks (short story)|Doctor Who and the Daleks]]''.
According to what I can tell, actually, we have precedent for including stories released as advertisements. Look at ''[[Doctor Who and the Daleks (short story)|Doctor Who and the Daleks]]''.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150824105758-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:27, 27 April 2023

Notsimonpegg wrote: WeLoveTITANS is obviously not meant to count; it's an advertisement. It would be like saying the PRIME computer adverts are valid sources, or that the Doctor has a TARDIS tuner.

According to what I can tell, actually, we have precedent for including stories released as advertisements. Look at Doctor Who and the Daleks.