User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-5545417-20150729134838: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-5545417-20150729134838'''
Consensus is about how each of us interpret the author's intent and if #4 is relevant.  
Consensus is about how each of us interpret the author's intent and if #4 is relevant.  


Line 9: Line 8:


I have to admit there can't be a neat line.
I have to admit there can't be a neat line.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150729134838-5545417]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:27, 27 April 2023

Consensus is about how each of us interpret the author's intent and if #4 is relevant.

About the comic strips WeLoveTITANS, "created by photographing a story out of Titan vinyl figurines" (quoting from our series page), the intent of the author AJ is more evident in my eyes.

About the cartoonish strips that we call "backup stories", I think their authors wouldn't have sorted out their ideas that way if they were supposed to feature in a traditional story of Doctor Who (video, audio, prose or main story of the comic book), nor they would have been accepted that way.

Both series are plenty of references to traditional adventures.

I have to admit there can't be a neat line.