Talk:The Dream Lord: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 14: Line 14:


==Race==
==Race==
Due to the fact that the Dream Lord is a mental embodiment of the Doctor's dark side, wouldn't that make him, at least essentially, a Time Lord/Gallifreyan? At least a dream one. [[User:Adam 148|Adam 148]] 20:47, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
Due to the fact that the Dream Lord is a mental embodiment of the Doctor's dark side, wouldn't that make him, at least essentially, a Time Lord/Gallifreyan? At least a dream one. [[User:Adam 148|Adam 148]] 20:47, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
:The article on [[The Watcher]] classifies his species as "Gallifreyan Time Lord (special case)," I imagine the Dream Lord would fall under the same classification.  -[[Special:Contributions/207.224.87.238|207.224.87.238]] 04:54, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:54, 16 May 2010

"According to the Master, the Valeyard is the personification of all that is evil within the Doctor, estimated to have been taken from somewhere between his twelfth and final incarnations." --94.171.77.82 18:47, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

So as it's the eleventh doctor, we can expressely rule out it's the Valeyard then on the basis of that quote. You can't have the latter part of the quote (the "estimation") being totally wrong, while the first part is deemed correct. It's a total logical fallacy if ever I saw one. Not only that but there's no citation for it being the Valeyard whatsoever in the episode Amy's Choice itself. There's no point speculating or assuming things without full proper sourcing or evidence to back it up. One wishy-washy phrase from the Master in one episode not even from the new series since 2005 just isn't good enough. Blightsoot 18:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
The operative word is "estimate". One regeneration off isn't bad. And it is properly sourced and evidenced, you just choose to think of the phrase used as "wishy-washy" and ignore it. --94.171.77.82 19:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)


dreamlord valyard

So far the doctor regenerated 12 times including the 10th doctors failed regeneration. The valyard was created between the 12th and final regeneration. The doctor is between his 12th and final.

The Dream Lord isn't the Valeyard, but is essentially the same forces that would later become the Valeyard. The Valeyard had a physical form, the Dream Lord didn't. So the Dream Lord isn't the Valeyard; but the forces that created him will later manifest as the Valeyard. And there is a difference between "regenerations" and "incarnations". --TemporalSpleen 19:12, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

That would seem to make sense. I like how you summed it up. My personal opinion is that the Doctor did think at first that the Dream Lord was the Master. "There's only one person in the universe who hates me as much as you do." However, this episode seems to imply (rather disturbingly) that the Doctor himself might also fit that criterion. Does the Doctor actually despise himself, deep down? It fits in with what we've seen of his personality so far - always running, afraid to face his own guilt... Bluebox444 01:03, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
Nascent Valyard, "version 0," makes sense, colored by the self-knowledge of the Valeyard that that part of himself may break out in the future. Bluebox, when the Doctor says there is only one person, he clearly means the Master, but there's a beat a the Dream Lord look back as if to say "No, two." I think the Doctor genuinely does hate himself; he committed genocide during the Time War and he's been running from confronting that ever since. The End of Time just dragged it all up again. -207.224.87.238 04:45, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Race

Due to the fact that the Dream Lord is a mental embodiment of the Doctor's dark side, wouldn't that make him, at least essentially, a Time Lord/Gallifreyan? At least a dream one. Adam 148 20:47, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

The article on The Watcher classifies his species as "Gallifreyan Time Lord (special case)," I imagine the Dream Lord would fall under the same classification. -207.224.87.238 04:54, May 16, 2010 (UTC)