User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-6032121-20190121210822: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Clever. One obstacle is that some games will be narrative and some won't be — a card-game with ''Who''-themed versions of the face cards would be a "(game)" in this scheme, would it not, just as well as something like ''Worlds Collide''? And it doesn't sit right with me to dump a piece of merchandise and a story (albeit invalid) in one category. But there are probably workarounds. | Clever. One obstacle is that some games will be narrative and some won't be — a card-game with ''Who''-themed versions of the face cards would be a "(game)" in this scheme, would it not, just as well as something like ''Worlds Collide''? And it doesn't sit right with me to dump a piece of merchandise and a story (albeit invalid) in one category. But there are probably workarounds. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190121193310-6032121/20190121210822-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 27 April 2023
Clever. One obstacle is that some games will be narrative and some won't be — a card-game with Who-themed versions of the face cards would be a "(game)" in this scheme, would it not, just as well as something like Worlds Collide? And it doesn't sit right with me to dump a piece of merchandise and a story (albeit invalid) in one category. But there are probably workarounds.
