User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-10983683-20140811212412/@comment-26845762-20160804134121: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in ''Attack of the Grask''. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid. | The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in ''Attack of the Grask''. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances? | My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20140811212412-10983683/20160804134121-26845762]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:59, 27 April 2023
The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in Attack of the Grask. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid.
As for the Cure of Fatal Death, a Master definitely appears. Does THE Master appear in The Infinity Doctors or Sympathy for the Devil? No, but a Master sure does. All of these Masters are different shades of the same person, the same character.
My views are exactly the same on this matter as RingiRoadAgain's.
- Follow the order given in Tardis:Prefixes
- Stories in anthologies should be listed separately
- Oh yes, listing NONVALIDs would be the best thing since sliced bread!
- I agree with everyone that we should just keep the prefix headings we have now
My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances?
