User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20130203002409/@comment-188432-20131129041602: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20130203002409/@comment-188432-20131129041602'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Lego Whovian wrote:
Lego Whovian wrote:
Line 13: Line 12:


The matter was [[Forum:Should we still be trying to cover merchandise?|also brought up at Tardis]], and we decided that we would indeed continuing covering merchandise.
The matter was [[Forum:Should we still be trying to cover merchandise?|also brought up at Tardis]], and we decided that we would indeed continuing covering merchandise.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130203002409-1317169/20131129041602-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 20:54, 27 April 2023

Lego Whovian wrote: I don't think that the TARDIS Data Core should have home media pages. This wiki is an encyclopedia about the Whoniverse, not a Doctor Who collector's site, unlike the Doctor Who Collectors Wiki.

I mean, just look at Doctor Who and the Day of the Daleks at the Doctor Who Collectors Wiki. I doubt that the TARDIS Data Core will ever be that precise about releases.

Lego Whovian is now an admin at DWCW.

Lego Whovian, I'm afraid we've rather moved passed the point of figuring out whether we should have these pages. We're going to. We're only dealing with administrative issues of what we might name these pages.

And we tried to involve the DWCW community in this question back in 2012. As of this moment, I'm the last to post at your forums. I gave you guys an opportunity to comment on this very matter — and not a single soul bothered to answer. That thread went up on 9 July 2012.

The matter was also brought up at Tardis, and we decided that we would indeed continuing covering merchandise.