User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-1432718-20200305140345: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-1432718-20200305140345'''
Note to everyone: I said this once already, but please note, nothing has been decided here, so please stop making blanket statements that "such and such is the way things are supposed to be now". [[User:Scrooge MacDuck]] is correct in asserting that [[Tardis:Neutral point of view]] means that we consider every (valid) source equal when it comes to writing articles.
Note to everyone: I said this once already, but please note, nothing has been decided here, so please stop making blanket statements that "such and such is the way things are supposed to be now". [[User:Scrooge MacDuck]] is correct in asserting that [[Tardis:Neutral point of view]] means that we consider every (valid) source equal when it comes to writing articles.


Line 5: Line 4:


And a very important note: please keep personal attacks off this thread (and off the wiki in general). Violations of [[Tardis:No personal attacks]] could result in this thread being closed, as has happened recently with other threads.
And a very important note: please keep personal attacks off this thread (and off the wiki in general). Violations of [[Tardis:No personal attacks]] could result in this thread being closed, as has happened recently with other threads.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200305140345-1432718]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:16, 27 April 2023

Note to everyone: I said this once already, but please note, nothing has been decided here, so please stop making blanket statements that "such and such is the way things are supposed to be now". User:Scrooge MacDuck is correct in asserting that Tardis:Neutral point of view means that we consider every (valid) source equal when it comes to writing articles.

An aside into history: this wiki was founded before new-Who started airing, and the folks who founded it decided to accept prose/comic/audio stories as well as television. It seems weird to new users at first that we don't consider the television series the only and/or most important "canon", but that's the way the wiki has been for sixteen years.

And a very important note: please keep personal attacks off this thread (and off the wiki in general). Violations of Tardis:No personal attacks could result in this thread being closed, as has happened recently with other threads.