User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-45692830-20200707185743: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-45692830-20200707185743'''
The ''navboxes'' aren't. But the ''wiki'' is to some extent based around narratives (see: rule 1 of [[Tardis:Valid sources]]). So by default WLH is, in my interpretation of SOTO's argument, based around narrative connections as well.
The ''navboxes'' aren't. But the ''wiki'' is to some extent based around narratives (see: rule 1 of [[Tardis:Valid sources]]). So by default WLH is, in my interpretation of SOTO's argument, based around narrative connections as well.


(Note here that I'm not the one who raised this argument nor do I necessarily buy it, so perhaps SOTO should clarify what exactly they take to be the issue. I'm just trying to head off at the pass the most obvious problems in responses to them.)
(Note here that I'm not the one who raised this argument nor do I necessarily buy it, so perhaps SOTO should clarify what exactly they take to be the issue. I'm just trying to head off at the pass the most obvious problems in responses to them.)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200707185743-45692830]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:19, 27 April 2023

The navboxes aren't. But the wiki is to some extent based around narratives (see: rule 1 of Tardis:Valid sources). So by default WLH is, in my interpretation of SOTO's argument, based around narrative connections as well.

(Note here that I'm not the one who raised this argument nor do I necessarily buy it, so perhaps SOTO should clarify what exactly they take to be the issue. I'm just trying to head off at the pass the most obvious problems in responses to them.)