User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20151112135636/@comment-4028641-20151112215541: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree with that assesment. There has to be some places where we use logic even if our policies tell us to act a certain way. | I agree with that assesment. There has to be some places where we use logic even if our policies tell us to act a certain way. | ||
Does ''[[The Five Doctors]]'' still link to the in-universe video game? Because that's another example where it should likely redirect to the real-world subject while the in-universe piece gets a bad term. | Does ''[[The Five Doctors]]'' still link to the in-universe video game? Because that's another example where it should likely redirect to the real-world subject while the in-universe piece gets a bad term. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151112135636-1827503/20151112215541-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:27, 27 April 2023
I agree with that assesment. There has to be some places where we use logic even if our policies tell us to act a certain way.
Does The Five Doctors still link to the in-universe video game? Because that's another example where it should likely redirect to the real-world subject while the in-universe piece gets a bad term.
